Get the latest news about PS4 at PS4Daily.com and Xbox One at XboxOneDaily.com!

Ubisoft explains why The Crew is hitting Xbox 360, but not Wii U

crew

When Ubisoft first announced The Crew at last year’s E3 showing, the only platforms mentioned for development were then “next-gen” consoles. Now Ubisoft has confirmed that the game will be coming to Xbox 360, making it a cross-gen game. Understandably, some people have asked if the game is going to be made compatible with older system architecture, why not make it a full release on other platforms, including the PS3 and the Wii U. Here’s the official response from Ubisoft.

“The Crew is originally built for the new generation of consoles so when we made the decision to port it to the previous generation of consoles, we decided to focus solely on the platform closest to the new-gen’s technical infrastructure, which is the Xbox 360. We are not currently working on a PS3 or Wii U version, we are rather focused on delivering The Crew for Xbox One, PS4, PC and Xbox360 simultaneously on November 11th.”

So basically, the answer is because Ubisoft doesn’t want to focus on those versions and because the Xbox One hasn’t sold nearly as well as the PlayStation 4, they want to tap into that Xbox 360 player base that hasn’t upgraded to either of the new systems yet. The short answer here is chasing money, folks. The game was never meant for last-gen platforms, but given the slow performance of the Xbox One versus the PlayStation 4, Ubisoft felt the need to make the switch.

Continue reading:




  • ActivesiN

    classic ubisoft

  • Darius

    *The short answer here is chasing money ;)

  • RyuNoHadouken

    Not surprised

  • Ducked

    Not releasing it on PS3 makes no sense. They developed a cheaper version for the 360, the same exact port could easily run on PS3, as well as Wii U. Giving the 80 million install base of the PlayStation 3 they could have made money on, is just head scratching. Also they went out there way to make a 360 port, and Xbox One port, but not Wii U. Why didn’t they just skip Xbox altogether, and make a Wii U port? The Wii U install base is higher than Xbox One.

    Ubisoft, if your going to make idiotic decisions like EA, then don’t make excuses for it.

    • Daniel Gonzalez

      I think despite the Wii U having a higher install base than Xbox One, it’s likely to sell less in comparison. Though, I feel a Wii U port is more suited than an 360 one, considering 360 sales have dipped of late.

      • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

        Sales have dipped but there are still several million units out there

        • Daniel Gonzalez

          That’s true. However, it makes little sense to port it over if several million owners of the 360 aren’t buying as they did early on. It’s better off that they give Wii U a try and see how it performs.

          • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

            Ubisoft have said they aren’t happy with Wii U sales and wont develop till it changes. If the Wii U had matched their expectations i’m sure we would be getting the crew aswell

    • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

      Its not that easy to port from 360 to ps3 as people think which is why Skyrim, the orange box and the fallout games don’t run well on PS3.

      However it is far easier to port from 360 to Wii U.

      This has nothing to do with Wii U or its install base its purely about X1 sales. Ubisoft won’t release anything for Wii U till it dose better

      • venomjamaica

        The 100% truth is that it all comes down to the money. Just like the
        Tomb Raider exclusive for Xbox One, you can tell Microsoft paid Square
        Enix millions of dollars to have Tomb Raider exclusive.

        This new generation isn’t about making games for the right platform, but who is offering more money to a corporati

        • Daniel Gonzalez

          “This new generation isn’t about making games for the right platform, but who is offering more money to a corporation”

          It’s been that way for years, and that will never change.

          • Daniel Carvalho

            The difference is that in the past companies made money by creating games for all platforms.Now they only care for politic plays, buying and selling exclusivity, defamating other companies and trying to pose as the victims.

          • Daniel Gonzalez

            No different than 20 years ago. We just never heard much about it due to primitive internet to get the juicy details.

          • venomjamaica

            I think the real reason is they want people to pay for online hence why the Wii U and PS3 are left out.

          • Daniel Gonzalez

            No way of actually knowing, but it’s a possibility.

          • Ducked

            You have a good point there.

        • matthew garcia

          At least it’s only a timed exclusive

          • venomjamaica

            Yea it’s timed….. but they still paid an hefty amount for it.

          • matthew garcia

            Yeah no doubt about it

          • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

            apparently its the same sort of deal as they had with Capcom with dead rising and Crytek with Rise so we don’t really know just how timed it is E.G. Dead Rising 3 only appeared on PC

          • matthew garcia

            That’s very true. It might depend on its initial sales also how timed it is also. Or like you say it might just make a move to pc and that’s it and never see ps4

          • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

            i’m sure it will appear on ps4 at some point though. Probably last. I think it was a shrewd move by MS but the 2nd part of the story being exclusive would kill the 3rd part on Playstation almost entirely.

            I would suspect that Tomb Raider 3 would come bundled with 2

          • matthew garcia

            What’s weird is that you would think people would praise Microsoft for the move and be like now I want a Xbox one. Except it didn’t it seemed to have created a lot of backlash of people not wanting the console even more now. Almost had worse backlash the when Microsoft announced drm

          • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

            Thought is was a big win for MS but yeah Microsoft seems to get flak regardless of what they annouce

          • PlayStation4Life12345

            U’re such a troll … do you know dat =.= ….

          • iago parrot

            Troll.

          • matthew garcia

            Hi friend :).

      • lonewolf88

        wiiu has done better than xb1 for about 2 months now.

        • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

          that it has and its been great to see but i doubt the X1 will have the same issues as the Wii U when it comes to sales momentum. Nintendo is always an Unknown quantity you just cant predict what will happen with their sales or their games. You can say “sales will boast with mario kart” but that then makes it foolish to launch another racing game near that one.

          • Gameonfool

            People always say silly to release a racing game to close to that one or fighting game to close to that, maybe some of us want more than one racing of fighting game etc with in a similar time frame. I’d buy this and mario kart any way just cus your on wheels don’t mean they are the same.

          • lonewolf88

            when does the crew release? when did mario kart release? exactly.

        • LordiMcKill

          Wii U’s has always done better than Xbone

      • Thomas Stevenson III

        then they should stop producing for x1…right?

      • Rinslowe

        Unfortunately although this is true. I doubt they have a magic no’ to gauge their success on Wii U. And that’s the main issue they’re having. There’s no way to really quantify how many users are good enough for sales. As other factors have been involved realistically with the performance results of their titles so far on the platform. I think AC4 is perhaps the only title with a clear idea of sales as it was released for ports.
        I guess they’ll just have to dive back in when they “feel” it’s right and try again.

      • http://www.linux-guides.com/ Je Saist

        Em… couple of notes here. The games you mentioned from Bethesda and Valve were built around DirectX… and at the time none of the developers working on those projects had *any* experience with OpenGL. Little wonder their games didn’t work when they went to Playstation.

        Also: as a note right here… Valve eventually did invest in teaching their developers OpenGL… which is why Portal 2… which used the same exact engine as the Orange Box… ran like butter on PS3.

        Now, as to whether or not it’s easy to port from the 360 to the PS3? Oh, it’s easy. It’s dead simple actually, at least in compiling and optimizing CPU code. What trips almost every single developer up is that DirectX->OpenGL switch. Many developers wind up trying to use translation layers, which presents additional processing overhead… in addition to other bugs.

        Also, not to put too fine a point on it… Ubisoft avoiding the WiiU is generally seen a good thing. The company has a notorious history of maximizing gimmicks for Nintendo platforms… and I actually feel sorry for anybody picking up Watch Dogs on WiiU.

        • plwjr

          Also did you know that the PS3 is running a special type of Linux! That’s why it runs like butter too!

    • http://www.twitch.tv/insanityraptor/profile InsanityRaptor

      Although I agree on most of your statements, I think the reason why they’re putting it on Xbox One and not Wii U is because the Wii U has been out 2 years. When you think about it, the Xbox One has only been out for what? Nine months? It already has more than half the amount of sales than the Wii U has. And with some of the Xbox One’s killer titles coming out this year…I hate to say it. The Xbox One will EASILY surpass the Wii U in sales.

    • Rinslowe

      Especially considering the comment made “closest technical infrastructure” is about as bogus as it gets. This comment does indeed make sense when comparing the two systems Xbox 360 and PS3. However as you’ve aptly pointed out, it would not have been difficult with their experience on the platform and wealth of specific know-how again for said platform, to port to PS3 “as well”…

      The sheer amount of cagey PR rubbish that gets through to the press is staggering today in gaming. How this got past the technical guys is a mystery. If it came from the shop floor, an even greater mystery. Or they think their general readers are clueless.

    • Magnus

      Four words: sitting on the fence

    • companyoflosers

      It makes perfect sense for all the same reasons most developers didnt want to port for ps3 last gen. Its atchitecture is a nightmare to develop for and theyde jave to go out of their way to make it anywhere near playable. Remember how skyrim for ps3 was pretty much broken upon arrival? Thats what jappens to most ports on ps3 and thats the nuber one reason ps3 lost last generation even behind the wii. Sony learned from it tho and corrected the problem by making the ps4 basically a pc in a console casing.

      • PlayStation4Life12345

        “ps3 lost last generation even behind the wii”. Since when did the Xbox 360 come out on top ??? I admitted that Xbox 360 was a more successful when compared to the PS3 ( Xbox 360 sold more games than the PS3 but, the console sold less i believe. )
        However, Since when did Wii come out last ??? The Wii sold the most Units, over 100 Millions with over 900 Millions Games Sold. The Wii was the one that dominated last-gen. Not Xbox or PlayStation.
        I hate it when people ignored how successful and popular is the Wii ….

        • companyoflosers

          you are right but i feel like sony fans hate it more when i compare it to the wii then the xbox XD. its a system that while successful is pretty widely accepted by the community as kind of a failure in terms of actual play time.

          • PlayStation4Life12345

            Not really, I’m a PlayStation fan myself. I have no problem with the Wii or Nintendo, infact I’m more of a Ninty fan than Sony fan XD.
            just sayin’ ;).

    • jonen

      actually, it makes perfect sense for the only 7th gen console to release this on be 360. lets compare 360 to PS3, the ps3 has this annoying RAM setup where half of the 512MB is Vram and the rest is system memory, making open world games hard to port. not to forget the cell architecture that no developer likes. easy choice there.

      Wii U versus 360? well the Wii U has a somewhat similar architecture and more RAM to help out open world games, though the CPU is quite slow, but it could probably run. but then again, Wii U has sold like 7 Million versus 80 Million for the 360. not hard to see why the Wii U loses out there. some may question why the X1 selling about the same as Wii U gets a port, but the X1 has good specs, Wii U doesnt

  • Mr Ninty

    its al about the money or are they dumb dumb dadadi dumb( dont know how that song goes)

  • FutureFox

    …and the craziness continues….

  • Merry_Blind

    Except the Wii U’s architecture is VERY similar to the 360’s… so that doesn’t make much sense…

    • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

      Ubisoft wont make any Wii U games till THEIR happy with it, it’#s why there is a lot of Ubisoft sales on eShop they continually checking to see if the new Wii U owners are interested in their games

      • Merry_Blind

        Oh I know that, I was just “exposing” their bullshit, but I know the reason is simply that they don’t consider it profitable enough to do, which is understandable, but still a bummer…

        • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

          Almost every PR statement is bullshit, I don’t get how an industry that relies on close ties with gamers uses same corporate speak as others.

          • Merry_Blind

            Well it doesn’t HAVE to rely on close ties with us gamers. That’s just marketing tricks (like how Sony and Microsoft are now both saying “WE’RE FOR THE GAMERS”), however there ARE some genuinely friendly, generous and ethical developers out there such as CD Projekt Red who make the Witche series, or Grinding Gear Games who make Path of Exile, or many indie developers, who do want to make a connection with their fans, because they are gamers too, first and foremost, who want to make games for fun in the first place, not for money. Though everybody needs to eat, so money has to come from somewhere.

          • Jon Turner

            IIRc, CD Project Red even said that there’s no stopping them from porting WITCHER to WiiU if they wanted to, but I don’t remember the source.

          • Merry_Blind

            Mmmh… that would be quite interesting and significant. I’ll be picking it up on PC, but having such a great, mature RPG on Wii U would definitely cover a genre that Nintendo usually doesn’t touch (you usually find JRPG on Nintendo consoles).

          • Jon Turner

            Super NES had a RICH plethora of JRPGs. N64 was the only one where they were lacking. But GameCube had TALES OF SYMPHONIA, BATEN KAITOS and even PAPER MARIO. Wii, despite what anyone may say about third party support on that, actually had some JRPG gems, too — XENOBLADE CHRONICLES, THE LAST STORY, ARC RISE FANTASIA, TALES OF SYMPHONIA 2 (Yes, Iliked this game), SAKURA WARS, and others.
            It’s not unrealistic to hope that some of these types of games will hit WiiU. KH3 would be great, but whether it comes or not, XBC will be amazing, and hopefully the success of it, ALPHADIA GENESIS, FExSMT, or whatever other JRPG hits WiiU succeeds, I don’t think thirds will want to avoid WiiU if it proves to be a viable platform for those type of games.

          • Merry_Blind

            I know… I said Nintendo usually get JRPGs on their consoles, but they rarely get Western-style RPGs.

          • Jon Turner

            The only exception we recently had was MASS EFFECT 3, and even then that was a port. Likewise with DEUS EX. I still would like to see KH3 on WiiU, but I don’t want to set my hopes too high either.

          • Merry_Blind

            Yeah that’s true.

  • Michael Ngo

    .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . .
    .“~.,

    . . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,

    . . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,

    . . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,

    . . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}

    . . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}

    . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./

    . . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./

    . . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./

    . . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/

    . . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}

    . . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../

    . . . .. . .`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../

    . . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”

    . . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . … . /

    . . . . . . `~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./…..,__

    ,,_. . . . . }****;-._. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,

    . .. `=~-,__. . . `,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `. . . . . .
    ..__

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .******;–==“

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`

    • Epicstuf

      DAFAQ?

  • bistricky

    Ubisoft ….. keep trying to kick us gamers who always supported you …..

    You’ll fail ……

    http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l1v5at6ZYB1qzado8o1_250.gif

  • Sdudyoy

    And here we are still waiting for our Watch dogs port, even if they where working on a port for this game to Wii U, I wouldn’t expect it till everyone had forgotten about this game, and then Ubisoft would use the classic excuse of “The Wii U not having a big enough install base” even though the Wii U has a bigger install base than the Xbox one anyway.

    • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

      think they look at it Install base as sale vs Time

  • Leonel

    My guess would be since the game is most likely to sell on ps4 and wont sale that high on xbox one compare to ps4. So they would combine xbox one and 360 to have enough sales. Its still bs that this isnt coming for wii u but o well smash bros will come soon.

    • FutureFox

      Microsoft likely had a strong say in the matter. “Hey guys, listen… the Xbox One isn’t selling quite the way we expected. So could you umm, I dunno maybe do us a solid and port it to 360 also??? You will! Cool bro, good looking out….good looking out.”

      • Leonel

        Ill take that as well, but if you compare some games they will likely sell better on ps4 and watch dogs didn’t push xbox one hardware. Im pretty sure it benefits both ubisoft and microsoft. No worries when the holiday comes and smash bros is kicking out competition then we will all be smiling that wii u is still strong.

  • https://www.facebook.com/BlueLightningTechnicalServices Bob Wilkerson

    Sounds like BS… The 360 is not even close to the XBOX one in architecture. I would have to say the XB360 and Wii U are closer in terms of compatible architecture than the 360 is with the XBOX One.

    • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

      true but 360 is closer to X1 than the PS3 and (to a far lesser degree) the Wii U

      Frankly i doubt Ubisoft even thought about Wii U or Ps3 when thinking of this port this is Ubisofts new favourite word appearing “install base”

      • https://www.facebook.com/BlueLightningTechnicalServices Bob Wilkerson

        What I find funny is that they originally said that this game could not run on any console other than the XB1 and PS4 and PC because of the ram limitations. Seeing as the Wii U has way more ram than the XB360 and PS3 it just means Ubisoft is caught in yet another BS lie.

  • Petri

    Well, since Ubisoft seems to continue lying ,hypocrisy and taking gamers for dummies, I am not going to buy their games anymore.
    Last game I will buy, is BG&E 2, and even then I might just pirate it and send my 60€ directly to M. Ancel, since Ubisoft deserves none.
    I kinda feel stupid for buying the AC games just for support, I could never get in to any of them.
    I was expecting too much from Splinter Cell, used to love those games. But Blacklist was a spat on the face of fans.
    Though Ubisoft games weren’t really the reason I bought Wii U.

    • Rinslowe

      I wish I could really care, as it’s a shame that the AC franchise is no longer supported on Wii U. Both AC3 and 4 being solid ports. Totally playable…
      If they chose to support the platform specifically with the AC franchise despite poor sales. I think Ubisoft would be faring better right now with Wii U owners.
      In my thinking for an unknown launch title, Zombie U performed OK. Roughly 700K copies sold or more? I’m sure a sequel which took into consideration the criticisms of the first game would fair quite well if they chose to make it. Marketed it properly and maybe even included the first title as a bonus.
      A lot of the audience for the typical third party multiplat isn’t there on Wii U. Those that do enjoy the majority of those titles like myself own a PC or to a lesser degree one or more of the other systems. Where the experience is typically better (mostly in regards to PC). So probably part of the whole problem right there…

      • Petri

        Both AC’s on Wii U had worse framerate drops than on ps360.
        But that is not why I dislike the series. Those games just get too repetitive and too boring, too soon.
        Same problem with Far Cry 3, and I don’t expect any better from FC 4.
        Original Far Cry was actually fun and enjoyable. What Happened? Ubisoft happened.
        Both Crysis and Far Cry were pretty awesome games, only for the rest of the series to be fucked up by publisher.

        If they actually made an effort with Zombi U 2, and would admit and promise to fix the problems that first one had, then sure, sequel might fair decently.
        The game does not have to be big budget AAA title, but at least work decently.

        I don’t see the problem being, that Wii U owners own other platforms.
        It is more of a problem with removing features from games, offering sub par products compared to other platforms, and general shit like this.

        Honestly, if I wanted to vote with my wallet, I would not have half of the games that I currently have.
        But I do not expect anyone to buy sub par product just for the sake of support.

        I’m actually glad that general quality of Ubisoft and EA games has went down the drain, so I don’t really miss out on anything by boycotting their games on other platforms.

        • Rinslowe

          “Both AC’s on Wii U had worse framerate drops than on ps360.

          In fact they were quite comparable. All things considered they were very decent ports. Which versions in particular have you played? For me; PC, Wii U and PS3, with the last one only briefly. However we all know that performance wise PC has best results. Which is why I’m always sceptical when people tell me last gen versions were “vastly” better in comparison. To me both Wii U versions had a slight edge in other areas over last gen. Especially over PS3. And more comparable visually to the 360 versions due to having 1080p hardware upscaling which of course PS3 lacks. AC4 had even more pronounced differences in visual fidelity due to PS3’s way of handling Ubisofts anti-aliasing approach. Despite DF’s claim they were all quite close. The PS3 version was notably a lot blurrier. Not to mention lacking in graphical effects.
          Totally agree that people should not support a crappy port. Absolutely. Unless of course they really want to…

          • Petri

            Only seen the comparison of Wii U, 360 and PS3, and only played Wii U versions.
            I could not see myself playing a game that I don’t really enjoy on 2 different platforms.
            In that Digital Foundrys comparison video, Wii U version was the only version that was more of the time closer to 20fps, than 30.
            None of them could keep solid 30 though.
            Though graphics and framerates do not affect me that much, unless it dips below 20, then you start having problems.
            But you really start seeing the difference, if 30fps drops to 20,
            more so than if 60 drops to 40.
            I’m not saying those versions were better, but solid framerate for gameplay is more important than graphical eye candy.
            You do not even need a big sacrifice, to get huge difference in framerates.

          • Rinslowe

            Lol. DF…
            Yeah I can attest to that happening on occasion. But it also happened on occasion with the PS3 version “overall” and no doubt the 360 as well. But I’ve only seen that version as a spectator briefly. So yeah, Wii U was hardly consistently bad in framerate to the point where it was that noticeably worse than the other versions. And still both games were totally playable. I’m on a playthrough of AC3 again right now actually.
            I guess we all see things in our own way. But as a PC gamer primarily for multiplats I do trust my own judgement on what is playable and what isn’t. If I honestly thought so, I wouldn’t hesitate in saying so. There’s nothing stopping me from telling it how it is, put it that way. Not to say you’re wrong about it. I respect you’ve also played the Wii U versions. So…

  • PS4WiiURocks

    Than they won’t mind if i pass on the game than. My money can go else where on better games…Ubi you are now just another flip flop company. Useless and im done

  • kentray1985

    Wow, whoever wrote this article cant make that assumption and the only thing I got from this article was a great dose of fan boy butthurt. Ubisofts statement makes perfect sense although I do agree that releasing on the 360 is a money move but one cant say they bringing it to the 360 because the xbox one is losing to the ps4. Im just about tired of all this fan boy nonsense. The main person Nintendo fans should be throwing anger at is Iwata then Nintendo for re-electing him as CEO. The xbox one is doing well in sales and hate shouldnt be throwed at another console just because a game is not releasing on your prefered platform. I have a wiiu, xbox one, ps4, and pc so please respect my opinion. This fan boy stuff has to stop!

    • PS4WiiURocks

      i have all the consoles and i can agree with the fanboyism but hating the fact that ubi is right ..i disagree..ubi is now a crap company

      • kentray1985

        They are like any other buisiness, company or publisher. They are in it for the money and I cant understand why gamers think as developers and publishers as one of the same when they’re completely not. Game publishers like Ubisoft are just like sny other game publisher and Nintendo fans should respect them because they are the ones that stuck with the wiiu when no other publisher did. You say they are crap but how is that when they make great games that you know u play. Everyone needs to calm down and just enjoy the games no matter what console they are release for. Im tired of everyone knick picking over spilled milk and bashing great publishers that fund great games that you know everyone plays. Dont say ubisoft is crap if you like child of light, splinter cell, just dance, assassins creed, the division, rainbow six, and all the other great games that will come from them. The worst thing about these fan boy wars is that all these so called gamers are being nothing but cheerleading hypocrites and it got boring VERY quickly!

        • 00EpicGamer00

          *a single tear strolls down face* that was beautiful. *claps*

        • PS4WiiURocks

          I was gaming long before most here were even born and none of those games like Child of light and splinter cell again crap now AC 3 and 4 i liked but what they did was rayman was bull and you know it..Again they are now another crappy EA and why is it they always give nintendo the crappy ports again im right and hell i own all the console and im not a fanboy nor do i care for console wars..That’s for fanboys so again your point is invailded and yes they are crap..Enough said ..Deal with from from a gamer since it began

          • Daniel Gonzalez

            When did gaming begin for you?

  • Jonathan Robitaille

    Hopefully this quiets all the talk about how the Wii U is incapable of ‘next gen’ games. It was never about power. So when you hear devs that are in Sony or Microsoft’s pockets say that you know they are full of shit. This is strictly about money. They are either getting heavy kickbacks from Microsoft or Sony or both, or they don’t think the game will sell on the Wii U. I think it’s a little bit of both. So, Ubisoft with their tepid initial support is now officially EA 2.0. Why anyone would support them by buying their games on the Wii U is baffling. If you think by rewarding their shitty practices it will somehow send a message to other 3rd parties that the system is viable, think again. You are dead wrong. Ubi is lazy, greedy, and don’t really care about gamers..especially Nintendo ones.

    I really hope they go through with Watchdogs and spend an absurd amount of money on it because I want them to fail hard as I know it will. They deserve it. And if you are remotely defending them you are a massive douchey troll

    • matthew garcia

      Honestly Sony is to broke I’m not sure where they would get the money from. Nintendo has a lot more money to spend on buying exclusives and game development. Nintendo needs to start spending more money to make money. They should buy the rights to some capcom exclusives

    • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

      that some nice circular thinking there “There arent many third party games on Wii U so i wont buy third party games till there is more third party games”

      • Jonathan Robitaille

        that’s not at all what I said. Holy no reading comprehension. I am saying that 3rd parties have abandoned the Wii U. The evidence of that is overwhelming. Nintendo made a console that requires them to do a little extra work. Since sales for 3rd party games have never been particularly strong, they are deciding it isn’t worth the time and money and I can’t fault them for that. What I can fault them for is making stupid statements like it’s about power…it’s about install base…or justifying a delay on Wii U but not on Xbone. It’s their lies that bother me. Like WB and that somehow the Wii U can’t handle the friggin batmobile. That is laughable. Or Project Cars delaying the game for the Wii U alone despite Wii U owners seemingly being most passionate about it. Or EA claiming games couldn’t play on the Wii U due to their engine. It’s just all b.s. and I really would rather they just not say anything at all than to insult our intelligence.

        Since I know 3rd parties for the most part will not put in the required effort and time into a Wii U port I’d rather they didn’t bother. There are more than enough games to keep people happy (though I did sell my Wii U but plan on getting another once Zelda U drops) and more on the way. Does it suck for people who can only own one console and will lose out? Well, yeah. But those people have to understand that even if the games come they are usually a gimped port. Instead of paying $60 here…$50 there..for gimped 3rd party games…save that money and put it towards a PS4 or Xbone.

        • Rinslowe

          I think it has more to do with their titles not selling well on the platform. If Nintendo licensed Frostbite 3 for all internal projects, then we’d hardly hear even a whisper of development difficulties being circulated. The hard part is justifying the cost vs reward issue as a viable business plan…

    • Rinslowe

      If the hardware manufacturers are willing to give, then we can’t really blame the studio’s for accepting. All creative aspects aside. It all helps when times are tough.
      It doesn’t do a lot for the industry at large though…

  • Andrew Clear

    This actually makes sense for once, since the 360 and Xbox One use Direct X, and the PS4 uses a Direct X similar library. Wii U and PS3 use opengl. So, I can understand this move.

  • CydeFxt

    God Ubisoft has worked it’s way down the list…..they’re not even B team anymore. If I even buy Watchdogs, it’ll be on Wii U and it’ll be used. But i think i’m done with Ubisoft.

    • http://gameknights-uk.blogspot.co.uk/ abe

      if you by Watch dogs used your part of the problem, buy it new possibly on sale

      That way Ubi knows people on Wii U want their games and that their is an audience is waiting for games.

      look at 3ds once a third party game did well on it other publishers wanted in on that cash flow

      • Rinslowe

        “if you by Watch dogs used your part of the problem, buy it new possibly on sale

        True, their market and sales analysis would be more direct.

      • CydeFxt

        There was a point where I thought the same thing as you…..But it’s just doesn’t seem like it matters anymore. How many times have i seen articles all over the web detailing how Ubisoft is making all these games for everything except Wii U. But in the those articles, the comments section was filled with people being frustrated or just outright done with the company as a whole.

        Ubisoft knows that Nintendo gamers want their games on the console, but time and time again they feed us bullshit as to why they are not bringing it over. Except for the 1 time where they admitted that they have “a list of games” made for the Wii U that they are holding on to until the system has a larger install base. Which makes sense, business is business, and that was the most honest thing i’ve heard from any developer/publisher.

        But you do make a strong point. I don’t normally buy games used……except EA games on my PS3.

      • Jonathan Robitaille

        exact opposite. By buying it used you are not giving them more money. They have already proved that is all they care about and they have stopped making games for the Wii U. Maybe Watchdogs drops but that is more because they probably already have it made. Nothing Child of Light has hit the Wii U. Neither AC game, not WD, not The Crew..nothing. So buying it on sale won’t change their practices. It will only add to their coffers. Let the break be clean and complete like theirs has been. You can still play their crappy port of WD if it ever drops but they don’t deserve to profit off of it.

  • SkullScience

    Well that’s it!! The 8th gen version will now be compromised due to having to get the game running on a 7th gen system (just like Watch Dogs). I don’t buy the ‘XB1 hasn’t sold enough’ garbage, if you look at the sales figures it is doing better than 360 at the same time. Just kill 7th gen off, it is getting embarrassing. By the time this game is released the 360 will be 10 years old!!!! Greedy dev/publisher just wants more sales whilst holding back progress!! I didn’t give a stuff about Wii U version, I never though it would be released, but I also own PS4, XB1 and PC and now know all that early footage will be ‘vertical slice’ goodness once again.

  • Alexander Munnerlyn

    Everyone!! Money Money Money!!!!

  • Milky Bacons

    Listen, Ubi doesn’t like the Wii U, or maybe even Nintendo. It’s not surprising that companies are overlooking them; and I’m a die hard Nintendo fan. Ubi would be better off just saying that they won’t make ports for Wii U instead of making lame excuses like the one above in the article.

    • ben

      No one would say we hate a product with over 7 million customers. The truth is Ubi is too big and needs sure fire sales the dumbest majority of gamers are on xbox 360/ps4/and xbox 1. They will buy any shit that is shipped.

      • Daniel Gonzalez

        Unless you know every single PS4, Xbox One and 360 gamer, then you’re just generalizing. I’m sure you’re brighter than that.

      • Milky Bacons

        This is true. Anyone with a smart mind would use and abuse those who don’t know any better. Good marketing technique, great in fact.

  • Jason

    The PS3 is WAY more powerful than the 360, and the Wii U is slightly more powerful than the PS3. I’m thinking Microsoft paid them money, and the XB1 and 360 versions will have exclusive content.

    • Phoenix Maybe

      Same way they paid Square Enix for timed exclusivity for Rise of the Tomb Raider, even though more Tomb Raider fans are on PS consoles.

      • Petri

        Good luck to them with that.
        Now that people know its timed, there is no way in hell, that one would choose xbone over PS4.
        Any third party exclusive they announce, wont mean jack shit, when people expect that game to release on PC and PS4 down the line.

        Though while good game, definitely not the Tomb Raider I used to love, and I can wait until its like 5€ on Steam, FU squeenix.

    • ben

      Urm.. I am no expert but the 360 is a lot more powerful than the ps3. The wii u is a lot more powerful than both the 360 and the ps3.

      • Daniel Gonzalez

        If you’re not an expert, then why are you claiming it’s more powerful than the PS3? Either you are, or not.

        • ben

          Because it is common knowledge that the xbox 360 was more powerful than the ps3. Go look at every graphic comparison site. ..Just like the ps4 is more powerful than the xbox 1.

          • Daniel Gonzalez

            A games graphics are dependent on the developer who created it. Just as there are many games on PS3 that looked far better than a 360, and I’ve seen 360 games that outdid the other ps3 games. So having said that, there isn’t any real way to measure power. I’m no expert myself, but do have a few pals that work in software development, and I think I’ll take their word since they are vets. Looking on websites, some developers say ps3 is more powerful and it’s the same the other way around. In other words, neither are confirmed to be more powerful. It’s a matter of opinion. A comparison site, can’t determine that, but you’re welcomed to believe that, however.

            As for PS4 and Xbox One, it’s the same deal, each one has their perks in hardware, so there’s no way to tell which packs more of a punch.

          • Jonathan Robitaille

            I agree that PS3 and the 360 were essentially give or take depending on game and developer.

            But the PS4 is more powerful. Simply looking at the specs and then the performance of each game released on both thus far proves that. Not once has the lesser version come to the PS4. In every instance the PS4 either equals or surpasses in resolution and frame rate. Now this is not proof in and of itself but in tandem with what we know about the specs each have it makes the most sense.

            I know there was talk about some potential cloud computing that would enable to close the gap. But if that was going to happen it would have by now.

          • Daniel Gonzalez

            Indeed, PS4 does seem to have the better end of the deal with ports. Of course, it’s too early I think to say which is more powerful. Even then, it’s really just our opinions on on what has the better hardware. All will have great games that take advantage of the power of both consoles.

            I heard about this cloud computing talk for a long time now from several people I’ve run into, and I’m wondering where it is. Even if it is true, I don’t see how that’s going to do much to be honest.

      • Jason

        Nope, the PS3 is more powerful. Look at the first party PS3 games like Uncharted and The Last of Us, they look far superior to any 360 game. Don’t compare the third-party games, devs just do a poor porting job when bringing it to the PS3.

        • Rinslowe

          If one was indeed more “powerful overall” than the other it wasn’t proven in the games…
          Both exclusives looked equally stunning on occasion.

  • http://www.twitch.tv/insanityraptor/profile InsanityRaptor

    Hmph. I expected nothing else from Ubisoft…chasing money.

  • Daniel Carvalho

    And that’s why I started this: https://www.change.org/petitions/bandai-namco-games-show-respect-towards-nintendo-gamers

    Just say you don’t think it’s a profitable choice. We can all respect you for standing up and saying you don’t think it’s a good idea because you will not get profit from a Wii U version, but saying ti’s not a next gen console when it has already proven to be way more powerful than the Xbox 360?! You think I will buy any other of your games after hearing this, Ubisoft?!

    • Phoenix Maybe

      Tried signing but it gave me an error telling me to sign later. :/
      But I’m glad someone like you is stepping up to these greedy publishers. That’s probably why people like indies a lot.

      • Daniel Carvalho

        Thanks for the support! It may be a problem regarding the site’s servers, but I believe you will soon be able to sign it. I recommend you paste the URL to your favorites bar and try it out again in 30 minutes.

    • A – Kuma

      signed and spreading the word

      • Daniel Carvalho

        Thanks for the support! Let’s try to make this change something for better!

    • Epicstuf

      Keep spamming this!

  • Phoenix Maybe

    BS. I think Ashley did a better job of explaining this than Ubisoft themselves.
    “The short answer here is chasing money, folks.”

    • james

      Umm thats what game companies do, make games to make money. Whats the problem here? Their games have not made money on Wii U, so they stopped making games for Wii U. Its a business. If they felt The Crew would make good money on Wii U, they would release it on Wii U.

      • Phoenix Maybe

        I never disagreed with that. I’m just saying that they shouldn’t lie to gamers’ faces with the whole “360 is more powerful” crap.

  • Googs

    ‘We want to make a quick buck because the X360 is the easiest to port over too”.

    • Merry_Blind

      Nailed it.

  • Adam Fox

    The real reason THE CREW is not hitting Wii U….they are Ubisoft….the EA of 2014

    • Epicstuf

      Ea was always EA.

  • Justin Jefferson

    Another loss in sales

  • Thomas Stevenson III

    thier excuse says it should be on ps3 if they want a system most compatible with current gen,,,strange. ubi soft is sounding like EA

  • Rinslowe

    “So basically, the answer is because Ubisoft doesn’t want to focus on
    those versions and because the Xbox One hasn’t sold nearly as well as
    the PlayStation 4, they want to tap into that Xbox 360 player base that
    hasn’t upgraded to either of the new systems yet.

    That’s pretty much the gist of it I’d say as well…

  • kentray1985

    The crew is not hitting the the wiiu or ps3 because they dont have cross chat. Why are you guys taking it as some kind of blow to Nintendo fans. Of course if the wiiu has no cross chat and its not multiplayer oriented then it wouldnt make sense for the crew come to the wiiu. I know fans are mad but be mad at Nintendo for making a half made multiplayer system. Miyamoto himself said that they were aiming at a local player experience while developing the wiiu now explain to me how that works with a mmo like the crew! It also make sense why a lot of mmos havnt been on the wiiu.

    • A – Kuma

      You destroyed everything else you had to say the moment “its not multiplayer oriented” showed up

      • kentray1985

        Dude the wiiu is not focused around multiplayer as everyone thought would be before launch. The crew is focused on multiplayer and no other consoles does multiplayer better than xbox 360, xbox one, ps4, and pc. Thats the only explanation that make sense for them not bringing the crew to wiiu and ps3. Its definetely not because the xbox one is not selling well which is a load of fan boy crap. Its selling wayyy better than the wiiu did in the first 9 months lol

        • Alan Michael Hensley

          i think a more accurate description would be to say the the Xbox One isn’t selling “as well” as they were hoping. it is sell pretty well, but not as much as the PS4, and comparatively speaking, better than Wii U. How ever, the predictions that the one would catch up to Wii U total sells by April was a bit of an exaggeration.
          Let me put it this way, between November 2012, and January 2013, if i remember, the Wii U sold around 3.2 million units.but then having no games come out until August, caused the selling drought, which is why they barely sold 0.6 million units from February to August of 2013. and as of the end of july, i believe they were at 6.8 million units sold.
          I’m not angry that the Wii U isn’t getting The Crew, im just a little sour that Project CARS was delayed on the Wii U when its been in development longer than the other console versions.
          If Nintendo can’t get a steady stream of games for nest year, i think we’ll see a new home console from them by 2017

          • David Trail

            Wii U is actually selling more than Xbox One in weekly sales and the Wii U is around to stay pal!

          • Alan Michael Hensley

            i said comparatively speaking, meaning that the in the same amount of time the One is outselling the Wii U, not in terms of real time sells. but yes, i hope the Wii U stays around until at least 2017,2018

          • Petri

            “Predictions” got me thinking, Pachter been awfully quiet lately?

          • kentray1985

            No doubt that Nintendo will bring out a new system with better specs but really I think all they need to is, give the wiiu updates and give the players more options. They need to make a adult space in the miiverse app and take age more serious because adults playing in the same space as kids can get pretty annoying. I believe the wiiu is the hardest out of all the last gen and new gen consoles to push out updates for being that it takes Nintendo so long to push out updates that arent even bigger than one of the xbox one monthly updates. The wiiu is definitely not future proof and Nintendo fans has to just chuckle it up and take that lost when games skip or cancle on the wiiu. I dont blame the game devs or the publishers, I blame Nintendo for being so cocky and thinking that going cheap on the wiiu’s hardware and literally making it only good enough to advance their franchise games. I blame Nintendo for re-electing Iwata knowing he has been making terrible decisions for years. Nintendo should have over thirty different studios working on games with the money they have and Iwata hasnt done nothing but slowed the company down. A Nintendo console should be crushing the ps4 and the xbox one but because that award winning direction coming from Iwata mostly all the hardcore people has skipped the wiiu. Its a shame too because the game pad feels so damn good in your hands while playing games. With a better leader for Nintendo we couldve got that chance to play games like battlefield hardline, dragons age, and far cry 4 with the gamepad now the wiiu is getting nothing but hand me downs and kickstarter games. I have all the consoles but I do feel bad for people who miss all the great games because they only play on Nintendo platforms.

          • Rinslowe

            “which is why they barely sold 0.6 million units from February to August of 2013

            This is historical fact. Why and how the fans and anti fans complicated this topic, I’ll never really understand…

        • David Trail

          The Wii U does it for free better than the 360.

          • matthew garcia

            Hey how you been havnt heard from you in a while

        • A – Kuma

          the crew: a realistic racing game focused on multi-player, not on the wii u due to an apparent lack of multi-player focus(retarded bullshit)
          Mario kart: a non-realistic racing game focused on multi-player, best selling game on the wii u
          You sure about that?

          • kentray1985

            First of all the Crew is a mmo (massive multiplayer online) racing game that ubisoft focused around social activities and a very important feature is cross chat so friends can stay connected at all times which the wiiu and the ps3 does not have. You also got to look at the fact that ubisoft wants to constantly update the crew which tons of devs say that its difficult to update on the wiiu. Be honest with yourself, Mario kart is going to always sell millions and that has nothing to do with the crew. Mario kart is not the same as the crew neither is it a mmo so it doesnt have to be constantly updated at all so your opinion on that is biased and pretty much false. You and other fan boys need to start thinking logically instead of showing extreme signs of butthurt. Being butthurt can lead to others becoming fan boys and cause a outbreak of some seriously ridiculous comments lol

          • A – Kuma

            “constantly updated” mmo you say? that’s very interesting considering i can’t remember the last mmo i played that got updated “constantly”. Everyone claims the wii u is so weak, so why is it so “complicated” to use? yeah, no excuses it’s just lazy.

          • kentray1985

            See you’re speculating on whats going on behind doors and you have no clue what these devs have to go through. Its certain protocols and procedures these people have to go through to get these updates up and running. Sure you can play online on the wiiu but it wasnt primarily built for it and once again, devs have gone on record to say that its hard pushing updates on the wiiu. You and other fan boys complain all day that these devs are lazy and they could do it. If it was a chance they could chase more money do you really think they would just leave out the install base of the wiiu and ps3. Its obviously a reason they arent doing it for those systems and being lazy doesnt sound like a logical reason. You guys just need to calm down and stop being irrational!

          • A – Kuma

            you destroyed everything else you had to say the moment “fanboy” showed up

          • kentray1985

            Sorry but fan boy is the only way I can describe you people

          • A – Kuma

            retard is the only way i can describe you “people” who don’t know the difference between a fanboy and someone with an opinion.

          • kentray1985

            Only fan boys aim hate at a publisher for not releasing a game on their prefered console. Nintendo butthurt fans always want to bash the publisher but will never admit that Iwata screwed the fans over with the wiiu. The wiiu and the 3ds has got to be the only devices ive seen in years to have a standard screen. Nintendo couldve at least managed with 720p screens. Now thats what I call lazy!

          • A – Kuma

            you really don’t know what you’re talking about. not appreciating a publishers ridiculous practices doesn’t mark you as a fanboy. Nintendo’s design choices are not really the point, do you even know what we’re talking about anymore?

          • kentray1985

            Yeah were talking about how you guys are such complaining fan boys. If the table was turned around and the game was coming to the wiiu but not the xbox 360 we wouldnt even be having this conversation rightnow. You’re one of the smart guys so go ahead, bash ubisoft for what you think you believe.

          • A – Kuma

            Lets make this clear: i’m not a representative of any group of people nor am i a part of a group of people, also if i was such a “fanboy” as you claim this conversation would be very different and would have already ended.
            if the table was turned we would definitely be having this conversation. it doesn’t matter what platform is being excluded, bullshit reasons are still bullshit reasons.
            and don’t even try to act like you’ve never had a complaint about a company before, that’s just stupid and i’m sure you’d feel only an idiot would call you a fanboy for it. If disliking something makes you a fanboy then everyone the world over is a fanboy.
            very flawed way of thinking, and really a lazy scapegoat response when no other can be made.

          • kentray1985

            Oh so you’re not only a fan boy but you’re a troll. If you havnt understood nothing ive said then im done.

          • Rinslowe

            Wii U wasn’t primarily built for online? That’s a false statement. Out of all the dev’s that have made updates to their games over the course of the last almost 24 months. Only very few have ever mentioned updates being hard to implement on the platform, particularly. That’s not to say I agree with the other side of the argument either. Lazy dev’s is an outdated viewpoint and was never really accurate. It’s more about the cost vs reward factor in most cases. And realistically speaking, it’s difficult to approve a patch to something that has negative reward from the get go. As in the overall sales have not amounted to profit at that point and tracking shows it’s unlikely it ever will…

          • kentray1985

            Well said mate!

      • Merry_Blind

        He’s talking about ONLINE multiplayer, not local. He’s right about that.

        • A – Kuma

          oh, he’s talking about the ONLINE is he? Oh excuse me, i mean mario kart 8 has no online in it at all right? That’s not the game mode that everyone who has the game is playing, that’s not a game mode that’s getting an update on the 27th this month, noooo not at all, mario kart is definitely not an example of a wii u game with a focus for online multiplayer….lol you fuckin retard

          • Merry_Blind

            Oh I’m sorry, I didn’t realize I was being so disrespectful towards you with my comment that you felt the need to be a complete fucking dick about it.

            I never said Mario Kart 8 didn’t have online, so you’re the “fuckin retard” who’s talking out of its ass. Mario Kart might have online components, but the console itself (and Nintendo as a whole) is much more focused on local multiplayer than online multiplayer. That doesn’t exclude online though.

            You should learn to respect others, being an asshole won’t get you anywhere, and it certainly doesn’t make you look any more credible; it just makes you look like a “fuckin retard”.

          • A – Kuma

            alright, fine, i apologize. I just find it hard to stay composed when i see non-sense. You’re not a fuckin retard, you’re ignorant and misguided. What the issue here is: ubisoft is the one making the game, not nintendo. so it couldn’t fall on nintendo for the game not being made. they can make their game however they want, as of late nintendo is letting the developers do as they please and their hardware is definitely more than capable of running this game if they’re willing to make it a cross-gen game for a weaker system. No developer ever really outlines their reasoning, it’s always “oh it’s not strong enough” or “oh it’s too complicated”. Developers always complained about how the ps3 was built but it still got plenty of games, there’s no excuse for this.

          • Merry_Blind

            Thank you, that’s much better ;)
            Well I was just talking about Kentray1985’s point about cross-chat functionalities. I know the Wii U is a very well built and capable system. I have no doubt it’s more powerful than the 360 and that it’s just as easy to develop for, if not easier. However, it is true that lacking just a simple thing such as cross-chat could be detrimental to an exclusively online game like this one, unlike MK8, which is both an online and offline game.
            But yeah, I agree that too many developers are just being hypocrites with the Wii U for some reasons. Which sucks, because it’s a great little system.

  • FaTih

    Dafuq Ubisoft ?
    I’m glad that Activision (especially Treyarch) still supports Wii U.

  • MetroidZero

    Ubiwho?

    For the laughs:

  • Saul Rivera

    You always sound so bitter with these kind of obvious news…we know by now Ubisoft isn’t releasing games for the Wii U for the time being..why did you expect this one?

  • Leo

    Ubi$oft :P

  • GABRIEL GARCIA

    Ubisoft is a last gen developer that’s why they can’t make games for wii U, since the wii u is the only console really upgraded from last gen in all aspects.

  • tom

    Here we go again!

  • http://www.captincomics.webs.com CaptinnDaGameMaster!

    THAT’S FUCKING BULL.

  • Spaniard0069

    Because fuck you Wii U. That’s what they’ve been saying since Rayman Legends.

  • C.S. Bailey

    Rayman Legends started my distrust of Ubisoft, and just about every other announcement since then has validated it. No big deal, they didn’t miss my money last gen, they won’t this gen either.

  • Ferd726

    The reason it was obviouslying microsoft have better online then others like Sony Playstation have online but have a lot of difficulty the Nintendo online it just getting started and maybe it will take to more to developing because it was originally to Xbox one ps4 pc.

  • http://www.epicpassiveincome.com/ Elvis Michael

    Just another day in the life of the Wii U.

  • Shootdatrupee!…

    Meh. Wasn’t going to get it anyway.

  • AlxFry

    The reasoning Ubisoft gave in this case seems absolutely reasonable. I’ll let you know that the XBox360 architecture is very, very close to a windows computer and therefore it was always easy to port there. Whereas the PS3 has a more custom craft, hard to get into architecture (and as far as I heard the WiiU is also pretty hard). Plus the WiiU’s network kit is/was pretty erratic.
    Of course the reason Ubi is doing this port is money, they certainly dont wanna lose money. But in the 360s case it is probably small effort with little risk. Pretty reasonable for a company guys.

  • ShadowLotus

    Ubisoft, the developers of excuses.

  • LordiMcKill

    So an excuse for pure laziness then, which most 3rd party devs seem to be like these days.

  • TehEngineer

    You know what is really annoying me at the moment?

    The fact that under the ‘popular Wii U games’ section, Yoshi’s Woolly World is misspelt. Normally I wouldn’t mind, Except it’s the game’s (correctly spelled) logo is sitting right next to it.

  • Guest

    We want to create a next gen game for next gen consoles but instead of releasing it on all next gen consoles we decided to release one version on a last gen console instead because it’s pretty close to a next gen console but it’s clearly not a next gen console and at the same ti-

    What exactly are you trying to say here Ubisoft?…

  • John Andalora

    This article is bull, and here’s why.
    The original source of that quote you stated was from Kotaku, which read:

    We are not currently working on a version for PS3 and are focused on delivering The Crew for Xbox One, PS4, PC and Xbox 360 simultaneously on November 11th.”

    http://kotaku.com/its-easier-to-bring-a-new-gen-game-to-360-than-ps3-ubi-1621173825

    The article you got that quote from is identical in almost every way, except for the addition of “Wii U.”

    Ubisoft never talked about why The Crew isn’t coming for Wii U. It was some nut trying to stir the pot and get people angry at Ubisoft.

    Please cross check references next time. Thank you.

    • Epicstuf

      no

      • John Andalora

        Yes.
        I’ve lined up the proof right in front of you. Whether you accept it or not doesn’t make it any less true.

        • Epicstuf

          no

  • james

    Cant wait to get this on Xbone!

  • james

    Every game company is chasing money. They make games to make money. Why state that like its some bad thing? If Ubi felt The Crew would make money on Wii U they would release a Wii U version. They obviously feel after Zombie U and other games failed to sell well that The Crew would not sell well either. It will sell very well on the other platforms however. Its just common sense business. They are not a game charity, they like every other company including Nintendo are just trying to make money.

    • Saul Rivera

      Someone with common sense…hide before you’re attacked!

  • Des

    You know it’s a slow Wii U news day when Wii U daily isn’t talking about the great games coming out for the console but all of the games that aren’t. But I guess that’s just the state of the Wii U right now. Let’s hope that the success of Mario Kart 8 and the few other 1st part games on the horizon will give the console the boost in sales it needs to look more attractive to 3rd party developers. Which will in turn lead to more games coming and more articles about them. If not, we’ll be seeing a lot more stories like this one.

  • Epicstuf

    Once again, you disappoint Ubisoft. Did anyone remember when Ubisoft release for all major consoles? And no Uplay?

  • David Plugge

    I think there are more xbox360 owners that havn’t bought a xbox one yet then ps3 owners that didnt buy a ps4 plus ubi soft seems to like microsoft a little more every day. No wii u release makes sence in the #2014 plan for third party

  • Logan Waltz

    Because its cheap and easy and is guaranteed to increase sales and profit. Other systems would take more time and money to develop for and 360 is just lucky its so easy

  • PlayStation4Life12345

    Microsoft and their big chunk of money …. I hope one day Apple or Google created a challenging PC OS enough so that the Power will be balance once again :(.
    Also, just know that Rise of Tom Raider is the exclusive to Xbox One.
    Fucking Square Enix ….

  • Nickos Foivos

    FAIL as always. I am done with UBI.